The Amasaman High Court has issued a strong warning to self-styled prophets and religious figures following the reduction of evangelist Patricia Asiedua, popularly known as Agradaa’s prison sentence, stressing that no spiritual authority should claim credit for a judicial decision grounded strictly in law.
Court Rejects Spiritual Claims Over Judicial Decisions
During proceedings, the presiding judge cautioned that the reduction of Agradaa’s sentence must not be attributed to prophecies, prayers or spiritual interventions. The court emphasised that sentencing and sentence reviews are matters of law, guided by legal principles and due process, not supernatural influence.
Amasaman High Court issues warning after Agradaa’s sentence reduction.
Agradaa’s Sentence Reduced by the Court
Agradaa, a former traditional priestess turned evangelist, recently had her sentence reduced by the Amasaman High Court after a legal review of her case. The court considered factors permitted under Ghanaian law, including procedural issues and statutory sentencing guidelines, leading to the adjustment.
Warning to Religious Leaders
The judge’s remarks were directed particularly at prophets and pastors who often rush to the media to claim responsibility for favourable court outcomes involving high-profile personalities. The court warned that such claims mislead the public, undermine confidence in the judiciary and distort the rule of law.
Respect for the Rule of Law
The Amasaman High Court reaffirmed that Ghana’s justice system operates independently and must be respected as such. Judges, the court stressed, do not consult prophets, pastors or spiritual leaders when delivering rulings. Every decision is based solely on evidence, legal arguments and the applicable laws of the land.
Public Urged to Ignore False Narratives
The court further urged the public to disregard narratives suggesting that spiritual power can override judicial authority. Legal analysts say the judge’s comments serve as a timely reminder of the importance of judicial independence, especially in cases involving controversial religious figures.
