A growing public debate has erupted following claims and counterclaims surrounding the burial of the late Lumba, with critics questioning the motives behind the family head’s insistence on burying the body without an autopsy.

At the center of the controversy is the Abusuapanyin, the head of the family, who has made two key assertions: that his sole interest is ensuring the body is buried, and that he will not disclose the burial location to prevent anyone from later exhuming the body. These statements have raised serious concerns among sections of the public and commentators, who argue that such secrecy is unusual in a case already surrounded by unanswered questions.

Lumba’s sister has publicly stated her desire for an autopsy to be conducted before burial, a request that has intensified suspicions after claims that the body is being deliberately withheld from her. Critics argue that an autopsy is a standard procedure when there are lingering doubts about the cause of death, and that denying this request only fuels speculation.

Media commentator Ola Michael and others have suggested that the urgency to bury the body “at all costs” may be aimed at preventing critical details about Lumba’s death from emerging. These claims, however, remain allegations and have not been established by any official investigation.

Adding another layer to the controversy are unverified claims linking the matter to a group known as the “East Legon Billionaires,” which some commentators have described as operating like a secret society. While no evidence has been presented to support these assertions, the references have reignited past public discussions, including remarks by Evangelist Addai concerning alleged ritual practices involving blood donations in Ghana. These claims remain speculative and unproven.

Legal concerns have also been raised, with critics questioning reported court procedures related to the case. Allegations of conflicting rulings and unauthorized legal representations have been cited as contributing to public mistrust, though no formal judicial misconduct has been confirmed.

As it stands, the case remains unresolved. What is clear is that public confidence will depend heavily on transparency, due process, and adherence to established legal and medical standards. Many observers maintain that an independent autopsy could help put speculation to rest and restore trust among all parties involved.