The arrest and continued detention of self-styled prophet Ebo Noah has sparked intense debate across Ghana and beyond. Many are questioning whether due process and fairness have been fully observed in his case.
Has Ebo Noah Been Treated Fairly, or Singled Out? Ghana and the World React 3
Ebo Noah has reportedly been held in custody for over two weeks, with calls from sections of the public demanding clarity on the basis of his detention, as well as whether an immediate mental health evaluation—as suggested by some commentators—was necessary or handled appropriately.
At the same time, critics are asking why other alleged fake prophets, whose actions and prophecies have also drawn public concern, continue to walk freely without similar intervention.
Was Ebo Noah’s arrest influenced largely by his controversial “Noah’s Ark” stunt, which attracted massive public attention and ridicule? Or was this a justified enforcement of the law, applied fairly and equally?
This situation raises broader questions about selective justice, freedom of religion, mental health handling, and consistency in law enforcement.
A heated debate has erupted on the Ghana Media Facebook page over whether controversial religious figure Ebo Noah should be arrested by the Inspector-General of Police (IGP) following widespread public concern over his recent statements and actions.
Debate Erupts Over Calls for Arrest of Ebo Noah as “Ark Vision” Sparks Public Outrage 7
The controversy stems from Ebo Noah’s public clarification where he stated:
“I never claimed it was a prophecy, only a personal vision to build an ark. Ghana, forgive me—it didn’t rain, and the ark I built was too small.”
While some followers view the statement as an honest admission, many Ghanaians believe the explanation raises more serious questions—especially regarding funds allegedly collected from members of the public who believed the ark project had divine backing.
Debate Erupts Over Calls for Arrest of Ebo Noah as “Ark Vision” Sparks Public Outrage 8
Social media reactions have been intense, with critics accusing Ebo Noah of deception, spiritual manipulation, and abuse of religious trust. Supporters, however, argue that a “vision” does not necessarily amount to criminal intent and that faith-based projects often rely on voluntary belief.
Prominent writer and media figure Daniel Jeddman weighed into the debate, issuing a strong warning that has further fueled public discussion. According to Jeddman, Ebo Noah must return any funds acquired through misleading claims, stressing that failure to do so could have serious consequences.
“If people were deceived into giving money under false spiritual pretenses, then restitution is not optional—it is necessary. Otherwise, trouble will follow him in life,” Jeddman stated.
Legal analysts and commentators on Ghana Media note that the key issue for law enforcement is intent and evidence. If investigations establish that donations were collected under false representations of divine prophecy, the matter could shift from moral controversy to criminal liability.
Others have urged the Ghana Police Service to tread carefully, warning against criminalizing religious expression without clear proof of fraud. They emphasize that Ghana’s constitution protects freedom of religion, but not financial exploitation.
As of now, the Ghana Police Service has not issued an official statement, but pressure continues to mount for the IGP to clarify whether an investigation will be launched.
The debate highlights a broader national conversation about accountability among religious leaders, transparency in faith-based fundraising, and the responsibility that comes with spiritual influence in Ghana.
Ghana Media will continue to monitor developments and provide verified updates as the situation unfolds.
Ghana's biggest news and entertainment platform and beyond
